The effective design of healthcare quality checklists plays a pivotal role in enhancing healthcare systems. Despite their established utility, a detailed comprehension of design strategies and the role of stakeholders in formulating these guidelines remains underexplored. This critical examination seeks to bridge this gap, scrutinizing methods used in the creation of healthcare quality checklists, with an emphasis on stakeholder engagement. The lack of collaborative involvement in checklist creation highlights a significant area needing attention to ensure that the checklists not only serve their intended purpose but also contribute positively to healthcare settings.
Understanding Design Approaches
The scoping review analyzed the existing literature to unpack the adoption of various design methods in developing healthcare quality checklists. Researchers searched seven distinct databases—ranging from PubMed to IEEE Xplore—deploying an exhaustive search strategy. The criteria included studies that discussed “checklist” and “user-centered design” amongst their core themes. The review uncovered 29 relevant studies, which highlighted dominant non-collaborative design methods like interviews and surveys, involving limited participant interaction.
Stakeholder Involvement in Design
Evaluating stakeholder engagement revealed that most studies inadequately empowered their stakeholders in the checklist design phase. Using the IAP2 Spectrum of Participation Framework, researchers categorized the extent of engagement, identifying that the majority of the design processes isolated stakeholders from decision-making roles. This lack of collaborative involvement in designing quality checklists could potentially undermine their effectiveness in practical applications within healthcare settings.
Key insights derived from the review include:
– Current design methods frequently rely on limited stakeholder interaction.
– There is a noticeable gap in empowering stakeholders during the checklist design process.
– Shifting towards inclusive and collaborative design methodologies proves imperative for enhanced outcomes.
The necessity for clearly defined and standardized methodologies in checklist creation becomes apparent, advocating for a shift towards more participatory roles for stakeholders. Future research should focus on the potential influence of varying stakeholder engagement levels on the success of quality checklists in clinical settings. Integrating a collaborative approach could facilitate the development of more tailored and efficacious checklists, ultimately uplifting the quality of care provided in healthcare systems. Furthermore, by actively involving stakeholders such as healthcare professionals and patients, the design process can become more reflective of real-world needs and challenges, paving the way for more practical and beneficial checklist solutions.
This article has been prepared with the assistance of AI and reviewed by an editor. For more details, please refer to our Terms and Conditions. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright issues related to this article, kindly contact the author.
