A recent study highlights a significant gap in aligning medical treatments with the personal goals of seriously ill patients, revealing that only half of the care provided matched the patients’ documented wishes.
Study Design
Conducted across three urban hospitals within a single health system, the longitudinal cohort study meticulously reviewed the medical records of adults who were hospitalized for three or more days between April and July 2019. Participants were selected based on having a 50% or higher predicted risk of mortality within six months. The research team extracted and analyzed data from clinical notes spanning from admission to either six months post-admission or the patient’s death, ensuring a comprehensive evaluation of the care received.
Key Outcomes
The analysis covered 109 patients, predominantly elderly, with common diagnoses including cardiac disease, metastatic cancer, and chronic kidney disease. The study assessed the concordance between the patients’ goals of care discussions and the actual treatments administered. Findings indicate that 50% of the care episodes were in alignment with patient goals, while 19% were discordant, and 32% remained uncertain. Notably, a substantial proportion of patients experienced at least one episode of care that did not align with their expressed wishes.
- High interrater reliability indicates robust methodology for classifying care received.
- Significant number of care episodes lacked clear alignment with patient goals.
- Uncertainty in care alignment underscores the need for better documentation and communication.
The findings underscore the critical need for improved strategies in ensuring that medical treatments honor the individual objectives of patients facing serious illnesses. Enhancing the accuracy and efficiency of documenting patient goals could bridge the current gap between desired and actual care, ultimately improving patient satisfaction and outcomes. Healthcare providers might consider integrating advanced text-based classification systems to systematically assess and align treatments with patient preferences, fostering a more patient-centered approach in clinical settings.
Improving goal-concordant care is essential not only for enhancing patient trust and satisfaction but also for optimizing resource allocation in healthcare systems. By prioritizing the alignment of medical interventions with patient values and preferences, healthcare facilities can ensure more personalized and effective care, reducing instances of unnecessary or unwanted treatments. This study serves as a call to action for medical institutions to invest in better documentation practices and to leverage technology for more accurate and scalable measurement of care concordance.
This article has been prepared with the assistance of AI and reviewed by an editor. For more details, please refer to our Terms and Conditions. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright issues related to this article, kindly contact the author.
