Despite the introduction of comprehensive guidelines aimed at standardizing sepsis treatment, Japanese hospitals show little improvement in adherence, revealing significant inconsistencies in clinical practice across the nation.
A recent nationwide retrospective cohort study analyzed data from over 213,000 sepsis patients across 791 hospitals to assess the impact of the Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock (J-SSCG) 2020. The study focused on 26 key recommendations, evaluating how closely hospitals followed these guidelines before and after their publication.
Adherence Rates Lagging Behind Expected Standards
Findings indicate that adherence to the guidelines varied widely, with some recommendations being followed by as few as 0.5% of cases and others by up to 98.7%. Generally, guidelines advising against certain interventions were followed more consistently, whereas those recommending specific interventions saw lower and more inconsistent compliance. Post-publication, most guidelines saw an increase in adherence by less than three percentage points, with no significant immediate changes noted.
Hospital Variation Highlights Implementation Challenges
The study also uncovered substantial variation between hospitals, as evidenced by adjusted intraclass correlation coefficients exceeding 10% for the majority of clinical questions. This variation remained unchanged after the introduction of the guidelines, suggesting persistent regional or institutional barriers to uniform implementation. Both longstanding and newly introduced recommendations in the 2020 guidelines exhibited similarly limited adherence improvements.
- Persistent low adherence to key sepsis interventions despite guideline updates.
- High variability between hospitals indicates inconsistent implementation efforts.
- Minimal improvements post-guideline suggest ineffective dissemination or training.
- Challenges in standardizing sepsis care may stem from resource disparities or differing clinical priorities.
The study underscores the difficulty of translating clinical guidelines into practice, particularly in the context of complex conditions like sepsis. Factors such as hospital resources, staff training, and existing clinical cultures likely play significant roles in the observed adherence patterns. Addressing these barriers is crucial for improving sepsis outcomes and ensuring that all patients receive evidence-based care regardless of where they are treated.
This article has been prepared with the assistance of AI and reviewed by an editor. For more details, please refer to our Terms and Conditions. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright issues related to this article, kindly contact the author.
