A recent study highlights the critical need for effective nutritional screening tools in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), particularly for cancer patients preparing for surgery. With malnutrition affecting approximately one-third of these patients, accurate detection is essential for successful treatment outcomes.
Assessing Screening Tools in Diverse Settings
Researchers conducted their assessment across Ghana, India, and the Philippines, involving 167 adult participants undergoing either curative elective or palliative surgeries. The team utilized anthropometric measurements alongside the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST) and the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) to evaluate nutritional status. Statistical analyses, including Bland-Altman plots and intra-class correlation coefficients, ensured the reliability of the findings.
Performance of MUST and PG-SGA SF
The study revealed that the PG-SGA identified 66% of participants at risk, while MUST and PG-SGA SF identified 53.3% and 47.3%, respectively. When compared to the PG-SGA, MUST achieved an AUROC of 0.78 with 85% sensitivity, whereas PG-SGA SF scored an AUROC of 0.76 with a higher sensitivity of 93%. Additionally, PG-SGA SF showed better specificity at 42%, compared to MUST’s 25%.
– PG-SGA SF’s higher sensitivity ensures more at-risk patients are identified for intervention.
– The improved specificity of PG-SGA SF reduces false positives, optimizing resource allocation.
– Excellent inter-rater reliability across anthropometric measurements strengthens the study’s validity.
– Implementing PG-SGA SF in LMICs could lead to better surgical outcomes for cancer patients.
The findings strongly advocate for the adoption of the PG-SGA SF as the preferred nutritional screening tool in LMICs. Its superior sensitivity and specificity make it a valuable asset in clinical settings, ensuring that malnutrition is accurately detected and addressed before surgery.
Integrating PG-SGA SF into standard preoperative assessments can significantly enhance patient care in resource-limited environments. By prioritizing accurate nutritional screening, healthcare providers can improve surgical success rates and overall patient health outcomes. This study paves the way for more targeted and effective nutritional interventions, ultimately contributing to better management of cancer patients in diverse healthcare systems.
This article has been prepared with the assistance of AI and reviewed by an editor. For more details, please refer to our Terms and Conditions. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright issues related to this article, kindly contact the author.
