Childhood cardiac emergencies require urgent and effective intervention strategies to improve survival outcomes. Bradycardia with haemodynamic compromise, a prevalent cause of in-hospital cardiac arrests in children, presents significant treatment challenges. Despite this, knowledge gaps persist regarding the efficacy of various treatments. A comprehensive review aims to shed light on this, aiming to map out current literature, critically analyze present methodologies, and identify areas necessitating further exploration. Important insights emerged from the investigation of numerous studies in this under-researched domain.
Methodology and Findings
Researchers conducted an extensive search, trawling through databases like Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane for studies up until August 2025. They honed in on 27 observational studies out of an initial 5392 titles, featuring children who suffered from bradycardia with haemodynamic compromise. Overwhelmingly, evidence points to the efficacy of comprehensive protocols involving CPR, drugs, and airway support, with significantly improved survival rates in monitored patients.
Mixed Outcomes with Drug Interventions
Despite successful interventions with comprehensive protocols, the study observes ambiguity regarding the impact of specific drug interventions. Three studies yielded conflicting data on the use of epinephrine, showing mixed outcomes on clinical variables such as progression to a pulseless state, return of circulation, and overall survival. Atropine, highlighted in two studies, did not present a clear advantage in either scenario.
Inferences from the research indicate vital considerations:
- CPR is generally effective in improving survival in paediatric bradycardia cases with haemodynamic compromise.
- Conflicting efficacy data exists for epinephrine during CPR.
- Lack of data on essential interventions like oxygen administration and ventilation.
Given the evidence vacuum, it becomes apparent that existing guidelines lack a robust empirical foundation. Health professionals rely primarily on limited evidence and expert consensus when addressing paediatric bradycardia with haemodynamic compromise. The need for comparative trials is evident to bolster understanding and optimize treatment strategies. Significant research should be directed towards evaluating common interventions, exploring under-researched areas like oxygen therapy, and understanding varying outcomes from current protocols.
Future research should aim to substantiate or reassess current guidelines and practices, ensuring a more evidence-based approach to managing this critical emergency. Improved clinical outcomes should stand as a central goal, requiring active collaboration between research, clinical practice, and guideline development to significantly advance paediatric emergency care.
This article has been prepared with the assistance of AI and reviewed by an editor. For more details, please refer to our Terms and Conditions. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright issues related to this article, kindly contact the author.
