Adherence to inpatient rehab clinical trial protocols significantly influences trial outcomes. However, ensuring strict protocol compliance proves challenging due to the multifaceted nature of adherence. Trials often tackle these factors in isolation, leading to fragmented insights. A systematic review undertaken sheds light on the complex dynamics surrounding adherence within rehabilitation clinical settings, identifying strategic opportunities for enhancing protocol compliance and ensuring the validity of trial outcomes. Understanding and optimizing adherence are crucial for translating trial results into clinical practice effectively.
Methodology and Scope
Researchers conducted a comprehensive mixed-methods systematic review, meticulously combing through databases such as PubMed, EMBASE, and others up to April 2024. The study aligned with PRISMA guidelines and utilized the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) 2.0. This approach facilitated a holistic understanding of various adherence factors by synthesizing data from diverse study methodologies, encompassing both quantitative and qualitative insights. The review included 27 studies, predominantly focusing on stroke trials but also considering other medical domains, offering a broad perspective on adherence challenges.
Findings on Adherence Factors
The research revealed a diverse array of factors impacting adherence to rehabilitation protocols. Adherence measurement varied significantly, with few studies pre-setting adherence levels, complicating comparative analyses across trials. Identified barriers ranged from behavioral issues to inadequate structural protocols. Interestingly, adherence factors often interacted, emphasizing the need for integrated solutions to effectively improve protocol compliance.
Key inferences drawn include:
– Variation in adherence measurement methodologies complicates cross-trial comparisons.
– Lack of predefined adherence benchmarks hampers effective result analysis.
– Multi-faceted adherence challenges underscore the necessity for innovative, integrated strategies.
To maximize adherence, implementing a standard approach like a traffic light system could help researchers adapt mid-trial, reducing resource wastage. Behavioral science principles can offer valuable tools for overcoming adherence barriers identified and optimizing both intervention delivery and reception. Moving forward, the field benefits from an established consensus on adherence measures, facilitating comparison and improving research fidelity.
This article has been prepared with the assistance of AI and reviewed by an editor. For more details, please refer to our Terms and Conditions. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright issues related to this article, kindly contact the author.
