The adoption of Electro-anatomical Mapping (EAM) systems presents a promising alternative to traditional fluoroscopy for conducting Conduction System Pacing (CSP) in patients suffering from severe bradyarrhythmia. Recent research evaluates the balance between safety, effectiveness, and economic implications of this technology within the Spanish National Health System.
Enhanced Safety and Efficiency
A systematic review encompassing seven observational studies with a total of 231 patients revealed that EAM significantly reduces fluoroscopy time by approximately 9.87 minutes. Additionally, the time specifically involving His-lead fluoroscopy decreased by 8.08 minutes, and the associated radiation exposure dropped by 17.21 mGy. These findings underline the potential of EAM to minimize patient and operator exposure to ionizing radiation without compromising the success rates or safety of the procedures.
Economic Considerations and Healthcare Impact
Despite the clinical advantages, the integration of EAM into routine practice poses financial challenges. The economic analysis highlights an increase of EUR 1,397.81 per patient and a collective budget impact of EUR 1.63 million over five years for the Spanish National Health System. This cost escalation necessitates a careful assessment of the long-term benefits versus the immediate financial burden.
- EAM reduces overall fluoroscopy time by nearly 10 minutes per procedure.
- Significant decrease in His-lead fluoroscopic time enhances procedural efficiency.
- Lower radiation doses improve patient and staff safety.
- No improvement observed in total fluoroscopy dose or procedural success rates.
- Implementation of EAM could lead to substantial increases in healthcare expenditure.
While EAM systems offer clear benefits in reducing radiation exposure during CSP procedures, the financial impact raises concerns about their feasibility for widespread adoption in public healthcare settings. Healthcare providers must weigh the immediate costs against the long-term health benefits and potential savings from reduced radiation-related complications.
EAM technology stands out as a significant advancement in cardiac pacing, enhancing patient and operator safety through reduced radiation exposure. However, the economic challenges highlighted by the study suggest that its integration into healthcare systems requires strategic planning and potential financial restructuring. Policymakers and healthcare administrators should consider these factors and explore funding models or cost-reduction strategies to support the adoption of EAM, ensuring that the clinical benefits are not overshadowed by economic constraints.
This article has been prepared with the assistance of AI and reviewed by an editor. For more details, please refer to our Terms and Conditions. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright issues related to this article, kindly contact the author.
