Eating disorders, representing a multidimensional public health issue, challenge both psychiatric and physical healthcare systems with their chronic nature and strikingly high mortality rates. Despite the burgeoning awareness and research surrounding these conditions, disparities in quality and the lack of consistency in clinical guidelines continue to obstruct effective interventions. This study meticulously reviews a decade’s worth of documents on preventing, intervening early, and treating eating disorders through a systematic lens.
Approach and Standards
Researchers employed a meticulous systematic search of PubMed and APA PsycINFO databases, curating a list of eighteen documents, including formal guidelines, consensus statements, and national policies, published from January 2015 to March 2025. Each document was critically evaluated using AGREE II and the GRADE tools to determine the quality of recommendations. An integrated synthesis of key domains from these documents formed the backbone of this comprehensive analysis.
Convergences and Gaps
The review uncovered notable alignments in guidelines stressing nutritional rehabilitation, psychological therapy, and medical surveillance, with substantial support for stepped-care models and multidisciplinary strategies. However, inconsistencies emerged, particularly in pharmacotherapy and prevention strategy recommendations. Significant gaps were identified in standardized care level criteria and guidance on handling comorbidities. Moreover, recovery models remain underrepresented, and Italy notably lacks a centralized guideline.
Inferences from the study:
– Implementation of guidelines is unequal across regions.
– There’s a pressing necessity for standardization in care processes.
– Diverse approaches reflect differing healthcare priorities and resources.
– Fundamental recovery model elements are frequently overlooked.
– Comorbidity management remains inadequately addressed.
Efforts to address these disparities should emphasize harmonizing international guidelines and developing clear, actionable strategies for implementation. The integration of early intervention tactics and comprehensive recovery frameworks should be prioritized, aiming to provide holistic care. Emerging policy development, clinical training enhancements, and service reorganization can thus align more closely with evidence-based practices. As the understanding of eating disorders deepens, robust guideline frameworks consistently applied across regions could revolutionize outcomes, ensuring equity and comprehensive care for affected individuals. Stakeholders must cultivate synergy between research, policy, and practice to traverse the complexities of eating disorders effectively.
This article has been prepared with the assistance of AI and reviewed by an editor. For more details, please refer to our Terms and Conditions. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright issues related to this article, kindly contact the author.
