Health Technology Assessment (HTA) plays a crucial role in shaping evidence-based policies by evaluating the value and costs of health interventions. However, the intricate nature of many modern health programs poses significant challenges to traditional HTA methods. A recent scoping review delves into international strategies for assessing complex health interventions, uncovering preferred criteria, types of evidence, and value domains utilized worldwide.
Methodological Innovations in HTA
The study employed a systematic scoping review approach, adhering to JBI guidelines and Arksey and O’Malley’s framework. Researchers examined seven electronic databases, grey literature, leading HTA journals, and conducted backward citation searches to gather relevant records published between January 2000 and December 2023. Utilizing the Population, Concept, and Context framework, the selection involved a rigorous two-phase screening by independent reviewers, followed by a narrative synthesis to integrate findings effectively.
Diverse Approaches and Emerging Trends
Out of 10,684 references, the review identified 35 pertinent records from twelve countries, categorizing them into methodological orientations and practical HTAs on complex interventions. Three distinct HTA approaches surfaced: integrative, sequential, and concurrent. While theoretical discussions advocate for balanced emphasis across various HTA domains, practical applications reveal variability in scope and focus, with predominant attention on cost-effectiveness, clinical outcomes, and organizational factors. Notably, there is a growing emphasis on technology description, safety, and patient-centered aspects, although ethical and legal considerations remain underrepresented. Additionally, HTAs addressing complex interventions incorporate unique domains such as political factors, implementation strategies, stakeholder engagement, outcome uncertainty, adaptive methods, and real-world data utilization. Expert opinions are often sought when empirical data falls short.
- HTA methodologies are evolving to better address the complexity of modern health interventions.
- There exists a gap between theoretical frameworks and their practical application in HTA.
- Emerging HTA approaches increasingly integrate political and implementation factors.
- Ethical and legal aspects require greater focus in the assessment of complex interventions.
The review highlights a noticeable shift towards incorporating broader contextual and implementation factors within HTA processes for complex interventions. This expansion beyond traditional domains underscores the necessity for HTA frameworks to adapt to the multifaceted nature of contemporary health programs. However, discrepancies between theoretical guidelines and actual practice indicate a need for harmonization to ensure consistency and comprehensiveness in evaluations.
Moving forward, it is essential to explore the implications of integrating contextual and implementation factors more deeply into HTA. Future research should aim to establish consensus on evaluation metrics and evidence requirements, thereby optimizing HTA methodologies for complex health interventions. Enhancing these frameworks will not only improve the accuracy and relevance of assessments but also support more informed and effective health policy-making, ultimately leading to better health outcomes and resource allocation.
This article has been prepared with the assistance of AI and reviewed by an editor. For more details, please refer to our Terms and Conditions. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright issues related to this article, kindly contact the author.
