In the Netherlands, the landscape of healthcare for individuals with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities faces significant challenges. Residential care facilities, burdened with increasing demand amid a shrinking workforce, seek innovative solutions to enhance care quality and efficiency. Among these solutions, smart continence care (SCC) has emerged, employing advanced sensors integrated into incontinence materials to alert caregivers about saturation levels. The primary goal is to minimize leakages and improve the quality of life. However, economic and utility considerations are equally important as facilities strive to allocate resources wisely.
Examining Cost-Effectiveness
The economic implications of SCC were scrutinized through a comprehensive assessment conducted within a 12-week cluster randomized trial across six care organizations in the Netherlands. This study sought to understand the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of SCC versus regular continence care (RCC). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was the primary measure, focusing on additional societal costs against reduction in leakage frequency. Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALY) served as the cost-utility metric, ensuring a multifaceted approach to evaluation.
Results and Implications
Despite promising intentions, SCC demonstrated mixed outcomes. It was found to be less effective and more costly than RCC in terms of leakage reduction, positioning the ICER unfavorably in the northwest quadrant of the cost-effectiveness plane. The cost-utility perspective added uncertainty, with results displaying inconsistency across both the northwest and northeast quadrants. These challenges highlight the nuanced nature of adopting new healthcare technologies.
Key takeaways from the study include:
- SCC did not significantly lower weekly leakages compared to RCC.
- The financial burden of SCC outweighed its benefits based on current pricing and effectiveness.
- SCC may offer value through reduced weekly incontinence material changes (IMCs).
- Implementation challenges significantly impacted SCC outcomes.
While this economic evaluation offers valuable insights, it stops short of delivering comprehensive guidance on SCC’s broad applicability. This technology’s potential lies in its ability to provide personalized solutions through data utilization, although not every case benefits equitably. Implementation hurdles, varying supplier pricing, and individual differences are pivotal factors requiring attention. For future scalability and success, addressing these challenges and personalizing strategies based on specific facility needs and patient profiles are critical.
This article has been prepared with the assistance of AI and reviewed by an editor. For more details, please refer to our Terms and Conditions. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright issues related to this article, kindly contact the author.
